Reliability-Informed Life Prediction for New Energy Vehicle Components
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70393/6a696574.343332ARK:
https://n2t.net/ark:/40704/JIET.v1n3a02Disciplines:
Intelligent SystemsSubjects:
OtherReferences:
11Keywords:
New Energy Vehicle Components, Remaining Useful Life, Reliability Analysis, Machine Learning, Condition-based MaintenanceAbstract
For new energy vehicle components, remaining service life requires crucial maintenance, but operating conditions and incomplete fault records still limit the sustainable development of models. This study constructs a data-driven framework for batteries and traction motors by integrating fault analysis, reliability parameter estimation, and machine learning-based prediction. This framework can support maintenance planning and spare parts planning to some extent. However, these results should be interpreted with caution because component type, brand coverage, and data quality may introduce unobserved biases. More extensive cross-brand datasets, prediction ranges that account for uncertainty, and real-time validation are needed before reliable large-scale deployment.
References
[1] Wang, Z. (2024). Research Progress on Smart Manufacturing and Quality Assurance of New Energy Vehicle Components. JOURNAL OF PROGRESS IN ENGINEERING AND PHYSICAL SCIENCE Учредители: Aurora Publishing House Limited, 3(4), 56-65.
[2] DOE, U. (2010). Multi-year research, development and demonstration plan: planned program activities for 2005-2015. US department of energy, office of energy efficiency and renewable energy, hydrogen, fuel cells and infrastructure technologies program (HFCIT), 1-34.
[3] Zhang, S. S., Xu, K., & Jow, T. R. (2004). Electrochemical impedance study on the low temperature of Li-ion batteries. Electrochimica acta, 49(7), 1057-1061.
[4] Duan, X., & Wang, Y. (2025). A Study on the Impact of Local Policy Response on the Technological Innovation of the New Energy Vehicle Industry. Sustainability, 17(19), 8873.
[5] Xiong, R., Cao, J., Yu, Q., He, H., & Sun, F. (2017). Critical review on the battery state of charge estimation methods for electric vehicles. Ieee Access, 6, 1832-1843.
[6] Jardine, A. K., Lin, D., & Banjevic, D. (2006). A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mechanical systems and signal processing, 20(7), 1483-1510.
[7] Chan, C. C. (2002). The state of the art of electric and hybrid vehicles. Proceedings of the IEEE, 90(2), 247-275.
[8] Zhang, J., & Lee, J. (2011). A review on prognostics and health monitoring of Li-ion battery. Journal of power sources, 196(15), 6007-6014.
[9] Huang, S. (2025). Measuring supply chain resilience with foundation time-series models. European Journal of Engineering and Technologies, 1(2), 49-56.
[10] Luo, M., Du, B., Zhang, W., Song, T., Liu, K., Zhu, H., ... & Wen, H. (2023). Fleet rebalancing for expanding shared e-mobility systems: A multi-agent deep reinforcement learning approach. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 24(4), 3868-3881.
[11] Hao, Z. (2026). Low-Overhead Scheduling for Real-Time AI Workloads on Multi-Core Edge Chips. International Journal of Advance in Applied Science Research, 5(3), 15-25.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
ARK
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The author retains copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
