On the Marital Validity and Legal Application of Fraudulent 'Same-Straight Marriage'
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70393/616a736d.323532ARK:
https://n2t.net/ark:/40704/AJSM.v3n1a01Disciplines:
JurisprudenceSubjects:
Family LawReferences:
8Keywords:
Same-sex, Same-straight Marriage, Marital Validity, Fraudulent Marriage, Revocable MarriageAbstract
For a long time, due to China’s law does not recognize same-straight marriage, resulting in "same-straight marriage" long-standing, and triggered a series of problems. In fact, "direct marriage" is contrary to the value orientation recognized by the Marriage and Family Code of the Civil Code and does not have the legitimacy basis protected by law. The nature of "concealing sexual orientation" is similar to "concealing major diseases,"which constitutes fraud in the true sense of civil law and violates the privacy rights of spouses. The " same-straight marriage" with concealed sexual orientation should be regarded as a revocable marriage, and its spouse should be given the right to revoke the marriage. The provisions on revocable marriage in China’s "Civil Code" are not completely closed, and the relevant judicial interpretations do not strictly limit the circumstances of revocable marriage. Therefore, " Same-sex wife" may apply the provisions of Article 148 of the Civil Code to request the court to revoke the marriage.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Liu Minghua, Yu Zengzhao, Zhang Beichuan, Shi Tongxin, Li Xiufang, Li Yang... & Zhu Mingquan. (2015). Estimation of the population size of homosexual, same-sex behavior and related female groups in China. Chinese Journal of Sex Science (03), 117-121.
Xiang, Z. (2024). A Discussion on Legal Research Methods. China Graduate, (02), 74-8.
Lin Laifan, Zhang Zhuoming. (2003). On the Hierarchy of Rights in Rights Conflicts - An Analysis from Perspective of Normative Jurisprudence. Journal of Zhejiang University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition) (06), 6-14.
Ji Q. (2020). From Identity Distinction to Interest Distinction: The Dilemma and Reconstruction of the Privacy Limit Principle in China. Journal of Gansu Political Science and Law Institute (01), 74-91.
Xiao, X. (2019). On the Socialization of the Marriage and Family Section of the Civil Code. China Law Review03), 105-122. doi:10.14111/j.cnki.zgfx.2019.3.005.
Ji, H. (2018). The Retention of True Intention and the Rules of Interpretation of Meaning Expression - On Retention of True Intention Does Not Have Independent Institutional Value. Legal Science (Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law) (03), 9-99. doi:10.16290/j.cnki.1674-5205.2018.3.047.
Luo S. (2022). The Civil Code's Solution to the "Same-Sex Wife" Problem: A Discussion on the Validity System of the Civil Code. Journal of Shandong Women's University (01), 86-96.
Martha Ebersohn Farman & Wang Xinyu. (2015). Why Get Married--The Debate on Marital Aut and the Social Functions of Marriage. Journal of China University of Political Science and Law (04), 142-154 161.

Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
ARK
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The author retains copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.