Load Balancing Strategies in Heterogeneous Environments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12599358ARK:
https://n2t.net/ark:/40704/JCTAM.v1n2a02PURL:
https://purl.archive.org/suas/JCTAM.v1n2a02References:
11Keywords:
Load Balancing, Heterogeneous Environments, Network Performance, Scalability, Resource Allocation, Dynamic Load Distribution, Fault Tolerance, Traffic Management, Virtualization, Cloud Computing, Algorithm Optimization, Service Reliability, Performance Metrics, Adaptive Strategies, Distributed SystemsAbstract
In the realm of network systems, load balancing plays a crucial role in ensuring efficient resource utilization and maintaining optimal performance levels. As network environments become increasingly heterogeneous, characterized by a wide range of hardware capabilities, operating systems, and application requirements, the challenge of achieving effective load balancing becomes more complex. This paper explores various load balancing strategies specifically designed for heterogeneous environments, providing a comprehensive analysis of their effectiveness through both theoretical frameworks and experimental evaluations.
The study begins by categorizing load balancing techniques into static and dynamic approaches, examining their fundamental principles and operational mechanisms. Static load balancing techniques, such as Weighted Round Robin, are assessed for their simplicity and ease of implementation, while dynamic techniques, like Adaptive Load Balancing, are evaluated for their ability to respond to real-time changes in the network environment.
To rigorously evaluate these strategies, a simulation framework is developed, replicating a heterogeneous network environment with nodes of varying processing power, memory, and network bandwidth. This framework allows for controlled experimentation, where different load balancing algorithms are applied to a variety of workload scenarios, ranging from compute-intensive to I/O-bound tasks.
Experimental data, meticulously generated and analyzed, provide critical insights into the performance metrics of each strategy, including response time, throughput, and resource utilization. These metrics are crucial for understanding the practical implications of each load balancing approach, guiding network administrators and system architects in selecting the most appropriate strategy for their specific needs.
The findings of this study not only highlight the strengths and weaknesses of each load balancing technique but also offer recommendations for optimizing load distribution in heterogeneous environments. By bridging the gap between theoretical analysis and practical implementation, this paper aims to contribute to the development of more robust and efficient network systems capable of meeting the demands of increasingly diverse and complex applications.
References
Smith, J. & Brown, K. (2020). Load Balancing in Homogeneous Environments. Journal of Network Systems, 15(2), 100-115.
Lee, Y. & Wang, M. (2021). Dynamic Load Balancing in Heterogeneous Networks. International Conference on Network Systems, 50-60.
Zhang, L. & Liu, H. (2019). Static Load Balancing Techniques. Journal of Computer Science, 10(3), 200-210.
Chen, D. & Zhao, Q. (2022). Adaptive Load Balancing Strategies. Journal of Advanced Network Systems, 18(1), 120-135.
Xu, C., Qiao, Y., Zhou, Z., Ni, F., & Xiong, J. (2024a). Accelerating Semi-Asynchronous Federated Learning. arXiv Preprint arXiv:2402. 10991.
Zhou, Z., Xu, C., Qiao, Y., Xiong, J., & Yu, J. (2024). Enhancing Equipment Health Prediction with Enhanced SMOTE-KNN. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Applied Science, 2(2), 13–20.
Zhou, Z., Xu, C., Qiao, Y., Ni, F., & Xiong, J. (2024). An Analysis of the Application of Machine Learning in Network Security. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Applied Science, 2(2), 5–12.
Zhou, Z. (2024). ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-DRIVEN COMPUTER VISION: COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF SEVERAL VISUALIZATION TOOLS.
Xu, C., Qiao, Y., Zhou, Z., Ni, F., & Xiong, J. (2024b). Enhancing Convergence in Federated Learning: A Contribution-Aware Asynchronous Approach. Computer Life, 12(1), 1–4.
Zhou, J., Liang, Z., Fang, Y., & Zhou, Z. (2024). Exploring Public Response to ChatGPT with Sentiment Analysis and Knowledge Mapping. IEEE Access.
Wang, L., Xiao, W., & Ye, S. (2019). Dynamic Multi-label Learning with Multiple New Labels. Image and Graphics: 10th International Conference, ICIG 2019, Beijing, China, August 23--25, 2019, Proceedings, Part III 10, 421–431. Springer.

Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
ARK
PURL
License
Copyright (c) 2024 The author retains copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.