User-Centered Design for Diversity: Human-Computer Interaction(HCI) Approaches to Serve Vulnerable Communities

Wanxin Li

doi:10.5281/zenodo.13506623

Authors

Wanxin Li De Montfort University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13506623

ARK:

https://n2t.net/ark:/40704/JCTAM.v1n3a11

Keywords:

User-Centered Design, Human-Computer interaction (HCI), Diversity in Design, inclusive Technology, Vulnerable Communities, UI/UX For Marginalized Groups, Accessible interface Design, Digital inclusion, HCI Approaches, Cultural Sensitivity in Design

Abstract

User-centered design is important in serving vulnerable groups, which means that we consider this perspective when researching and developing new technologies and systems, and add humanistic background and diversity considerations. Human-computer interaction (HCI) methods should not only focus on the functionality of technology, but also pay attention to the emotional and psychological needs of users, and effectively improve the usability and friendliness of technology. Vulnerable groups face many challenges in accessing and using technology, including technical barriers, cultural differences, and economic constraints. This article will explore the application of HCI methods in designing inclusive technology, and elaborate on how to design a basic system in the LGBTQ+ community and specific methods to improve the UI/UX part of HCI.

Author Biography

Wanxin Li, De Montfort University

De Montfort University, UK.

References

Carroll, J. M. (2003). Introduction: Toward a multidisciplinary science of human-computer interaction. In HCI models, theories, and frameworks: Toward a multidisciplinary science (pp. 1-9). Elsevier Inc.

Ferwerda, B., Graus, M., Germanakos, P., & Tkalčič, M. (Eds.). (2024). A Human-centered Perspective of Intelligent Personalized Environments and Systems. Springer Nature.

Foth, M., & Brynskov, M. (2016). Participatory action research for civic engagement.

Kyriakoullis, L., & Zaphiris, P. (2016). Culture and HCI: a review of recent cultural studies in HCI and social networks. Universal Access in the Information Society, 15, 629-642.

Schelenz, L. (2023). Diversity concepts in computer science and technology development: A critique. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 48(5), 1054-1079.

Liang, C. A., Munson, S. A., & Kientz, J. A. (2021). Embracing four tensions in human-computer interaction research with marginalized people. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 28(2), 1-47.

Turner, P. (2017). A psychology of user experience: Involvement, affect and aesthetics. Springer.

Boletsis, K. (2016). Augmented reality serious gaming for cognitive health.

Glock, P., & Weiß, A. (2020). Legal Service Platforms: Balancing Commercial and Common Interests. Liquid Legal: Towards a Common Legal Platform, 563-582.

Meyer, D. (2015). Violence against queer people: Race, class, gender, and the persistence of anti-LGBT discrimination. Rutgers University Press.

Clarkson, P. J., Coleman, R., Keates, S., & Lebbon, C. (2013). Inclusive design: Design for the whole population.

Bevan, N., Petrie, H., & Claridge, N. (2007). Improving Usability and Accessibility. Proceedings of IST Africa, 7, 2007.

Cole, B. (2017). Bill Cole Design. Retrieved July 29, 2017, from http://billcoledesign.com/

Grates, M. G., Heming, A. C., Vukoman, M., Schabsky, P., & Sorgalla, J. (2019). New perspectives on user participation in technology design processes: an interdisciplinary approach. The Gerontologist, 59(1), 45-57.

ESCAP, U. (2021). Policy approaches to direct digital frontier technologies towards inclusive and sustainable development.

Moron, L. J. (1955). The homosexual(ity) of law. London: Routledge.

Terry. (2013). Gay influence. Retrieved from http://gayinfluence.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/somerset-maugham.html