AI-Assisted Structured Interview Analysis Using Natural Language Processing and Speech Feature Extraction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70393/6a6374616d.343036ARK:
https://n2t.net/ark:/40704/JCTAM.v3n2a02Disciplines:
Artificial IntelligenceSubjects:
Machine LearningReferences:
15Keywords:
Structured Interview, Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing, Speech Feature Extraction, Multi-modal Analysis, Competency AssessmentAbstract
Structured interviews are widely used in recruitment, psychological assessment, and social research due to their standardized procedures, fixed question sets, and unified evaluation criteria, which ensure a certain degree of fairness and reliability compared with unstructured interviews. However, traditional structured interview evaluation relies heavily on manual scoring by professional raters, which inevitably faces problems such as strong subjectivity, high time consumption, and inconsistent evaluation standards. Subjective biases, such as the halo effect, first-impression bias, and personal preference, often affect the objectivity of evaluation results; meanwhile, manual transcription of interview audio, coding of answers, and scoring of multiple dimensions are extremely time-consuming, making it difficult to meet the needs of large-scale interview scenarios. To solve these problems, this study proposes an AI-assisted framework for structured interview analysis that combines Natural Language Processing (NLP) and speech feature extraction. The proposed system can automatically complete the transcription of interview audio, extract linguistic features (including semantics, keywords, sentiment, and logical structure) from the transcribed text, and capture paracoustic features (including pitch, intensity, speech rate, and pause characteristics) from the audio signal. A multi-modal fusion model is constructed to integrate these text and speech features, thereby generating objective evaluation scores and competency assessments for interviewees. Experiments on a real structured interview dataset show that the proposed method not only improves the accuracy and consistency of interview evaluation but also significantly reduces the manual workload and weakens the impact of subjective bias. This research provides a reliable, efficient, and standardized tool for structured interview analysis, which can be widely applied in corporate recruitment, public institution selection, and educational assessment scenarios.
References
[1] Ghafarfaraji, S. (2025). AI-based recognition of facial and micro-expressions for the diagnosis of mental and neurological disorders: A systematic review. BMC Psychiatry, 26(1), 78.
[2] MacIntosh, A., Roulin, N., Amiri, L., et al. (2025). Artificial intelligence and the medical school admissions interview: Strategic guidance, risks, and lessons from industrial-organizational psychology. Medical Science Educator, prepublish, 1–8.
[3] Jarvis, A., Ho, A., & Lim, G. (2025). Impressing artificial intelligence: Automated job interview training in professional English subjects. RELC Journal, 56(3), 751–759.
[4] Wu, J., Zhang, J., Gao, L., et al. (2025). Research on an AI interview evaluation system integrating multi-agent systems and virtual digital humans. Journal of Big Data and Computing, 3(4).
[5] Colmenares, R. M. F., Gutierrez, C. L. N., Hernandez, C. C. C., et al. (2025). Artificial intelligence-enabled facial expression analysis for mental health assessment in older adults: A systematic review and research agenda. Future Internet, 17(12), 541.
[6] Zhang, Z., & Wang, X. (2025). Kick robots away with heart and head: How and when AI interviews undermine organizational attraction. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 36(19), 3589–3619.
[7] Higgs, E. (2025). Reading faces: Facial biometrics from Aristotle to artificial intelligence. Taylor & Francis.
[8] Xu, Y., Chen, Z., & Dong, M. (2025). Shaping the fairness journey: The roles of AI literacy, explanation, and interpersonal interaction in AI interviews. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 205, Article 103629.
[9] Luo, W., Zhang, Y., & Mu, M. (2025). Why might AI-enabled interviews reduce candidates’ job application intention? The role of procedural justice and organizational attractiveness. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1278.
[10] Hirosawa, T., Yokose, M., Sakamoto, T., et al. (2025). Utility of generative artificial intelligence for Japanese medical interview training: Randomized crossover pilot study. JMIR Medical Education, 11, e77332.
[11] Wang, J., Zhang, J., Zhu, N. J., et al. (2025). “Choose what suits you”: The role of relative competency strength in shaping job applicants’ reactions and strategies toward AI-based interview. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 19, Article 100777.
[12] Queloz, M. (2025). Explainability through systematicity: The hard systematicity challenge for artificial intelligence. Minds and Machines, 35(3), 35.
[13] Mamcarz, I., Podleśna, M., Bis, E., et al. (2025). AI-based facial analysis vs self-report: A pilot study using insights from pre-procedural psychological tests. Medical Science Monitor, 31, e947227.
[14] Ju, J., Qu, Z., Qing, H., et al. (2025). Evaluation of artificial intelligence-based diagnosis for facial fractures, advantages compared with conventional imaging diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 26(1), 682.
[15] Turgut, Z., & Başarslan, S. M. (2025). XBiDeep: A novel explainable artificial intelligence based intrusion detection system for Internet of Medical Things environment. Internet of Things, 33, Article 101675.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
ARK
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The author retains copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.









